Impact by Regions, Countries & Territories

UNDP’s Global Programme supports crisis-affected contexts across all regions to strengthen the rule of law and human rights. In this section, we present five regional overviews, detailing our priorities and approach depending on the context, as well as feature select country and territory results from 2021.

Five contexts from the list (Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Mali and Yemen) illustrate the achievements of the Global Focal Point for the Rule of Law (GFP). In peacekeeping missions and transition settings, UNDP’s Global Programme works through the GFP to deliver integrated assistance with our UN partners.

GFP Global Focal Point Highlights

Africa

Arab States

Latin America & The Caribbean

Asia-Pacific

Europe & Central Asia

Political
Engagement

The rule of law is essential for sustainable peace and resilient economies, as well as for the prevention or recurrence of conflict. To prevent or address injustice, inequalities or democratic deficits, UNDP works with multiple stakeholders to operate in a way that is consistent with the rule of law and creates opportunities for all individuals to exercise their rights and access justice.

Institution
Building

The importance of strong institutions is more evident than ever as countries and communities respond to disruption, whether because of public health restrictions, climate change or political upheaval. Limitations on public gatherings and travel have revealed the need for institutions that are resilient to disruption.

Community
Security

2021 was a pivotal year that saw various developments affecting peace and security around the world. Civic space continued to shrink and the social contract between states and citizens was increasingly challenged, particularly during and after the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Facing distressing consequences of climate change, states and communities are forced to manage more cross-border conflicts, triggered by the displacement of people seeking increasingly scarce resources.

Human Rights
Systems

The scope of human rights challenges is widening, from eroded public trust and shrinking civic space to ongoing inequality and human rights impacts in the socio-economic repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic, and emerging risks in the digital sphere. National human rights institutions (NHRIs), along with other human rights defenders, are facing rising and sophisticated forms of reprisals for carrying out their work.

Access to
Justice

Sustainable Development Goal 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) of the 2030 Agenda highlights the importance of access to justice for all for the development of peaceful and inclusive societies. Meaningful access to justice can only be achieved when people know their rights, have the opportunities, agency and capacities to claim them, and have access to independent, inclusive and people-centred justice systems that will respond in a timely, fair and effective manner.

Transitional
Justice

Without justice, there can be no lasting peace. In post-conflict, crisis-affected and fragile contexts, truth-seeking initiatives and reconciliation efforts are essential to bring peace to affected communities. The COVID-19 pandemic has slowed down transitional processes as states prioritized their response to the health crisis and measures to support the economy.

Gender
Justice

In 2021, the continued erosion of democracy and the spread of authoritarian trends in politics in many parts of the world contributed to a backlash against women’s rights. The COVID-19 crisis has reversed some of the hard-won gender parity gains by exacerbating pre-existing inequalities and power imbalances. It has also caused a dramatic increase in sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). All these challenges have been particularly acute in conflict, fragile and crisis-affected settings.

Innovation

New ideas and new strategies are critical to building sustainable and effective development approaches that really meet people’s needs. Technologies and globalization raise new human rights concerns and threaten the rule of law. Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic continue to limit people’s access to basic services. UNDP connected expertise across the globe to learn and adapt. Creating a culture of curiosity and experimentation, these efforts ensured that local needs and expertise were combined with emerging models to bring strategic thinking to people-centred development goals.

results framework

The Global Programme’s Results Framework tracks aggregated results across its 32 priority contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, and Kosovo1. In the tables below, we provide our results achieved per each of our global indicators since 2015. In 2021, we achieved over 80% of our global targets.

Building icon

Institution Building

Expected Programme
Outputs		Output Indicators2BaselineResults
ValueYear2016
Actual		2017
Actual		2018
Actual		2019
Actual		2020
Actual		2021
Target		2021
Actual		Key Evidence
Output 2:
Capable justice and security institutions are established and strengthened to increase and improve service delivery in crisis-affected and transitional settings.		2.1 Number of contexts where justice and security services reach out to an increasing and/or more inclusive number of people24202015262128222923312430253231

2021 contexts:
Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: Partially ACHIEVED
2.2 Number of contexts with national-level security strategies that are developed through a participatory process, comply with human rights standards, and/ or support reducing armed violence and promote control of small arms6201626627728829103012311213

2021 contexts:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
  • 20 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 21 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 22 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 23 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 24 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 25 2020 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 26 Baselines for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
  • 27 2016 contexts: Colombia, Guatemala, Iraq, Jordan, Liberia, Somalia.
  • 28 2017 contexts: Central African Republic, Guatemala, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Somalia, Kosovo [1].
  • 29 2018 contexts: Central African Republic, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Somalia, Kosovo [1].
  • 30 2019 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Somalia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 31 2020 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Haiti, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
Group of people

Community Security

Expected Programme
Outputs		Output Indicators2BaselineResults
ValueYear2016
Actual		2017
Actual		2018
Actual		2019
Actual		2020
Actual		2021
Target		2021
Actual		Key Evidence
Output 3:
Comprehensive community security approaches are developed, strengthened, and/or applied.		3.1 Number of contexts where gender-sensitive, evidence-based security strategies for reducing armed violence and/or controlling small arms are in operation at the community level63220157338341635153615371117

2021 contexts:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Sierra Leone, State of Palestine, Sudan, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
IRRF indicator 3.2.2.1.C38
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
3.2 Number of contexts with community-oriented policing programmes developed and/or operational7392015114012411942194317441717

2021 contexts:
Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Pakistan, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
  • 32 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1].
  • 33 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1].
  • 34 2017 contexts Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1].
  • 35 2018 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1].
  • 36 2019 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 37 2020 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Haiti, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 38 IRRF Indicator 3.2.2.1.C measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: community-oriented security services and oversight mechanisms”.
  • 39 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Jordan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 40 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Jordan, , Liberia, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 41 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Tunisia, Ukraine,Kosovo [1].
  • 42 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 43 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 44 2020 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Pakistan, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
Hand holding person

Human Rights Systems

Expected Programme
Outputs		Output Indicators2BaselineResults
ValueYear2016
Actual		2017
Actual		2018
Actual		2019
Actual		2020
Actual		2021
Target		2021
Actual		Key Evidence
Output 4:
National human rights systems are strengthened and made more effective in promoting and protecting human rights.		4.1 Number of contexts with strengthened operational institutions supporting the fulfillment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations10452015124618472448244924501723

2021 contexts:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Haiti, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
IRRF indicator 2.2.3.151
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
4.2 Number of contexts receiving assistance to improve or maintain NHRI rating from the GHANRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation5282017-8539541055856221157

2021 contexts:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: PARTIALLY ACHIEVED
  • 45 Baseline Contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, , Kyrgyz Republic, Sierra Leone, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo[1]
  • 46 2016 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, , Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 47 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sri-Lanka, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 48 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 49 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 50 2020 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 51 IRRF indicator 2.2.3.1 measures “Number of additional contexts with strengthened institutions and systems supporting fulfilment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations: rule of law and justice, and human rights”.
  • 52 Indicator 4.2 was changed from “number of contexts with NHRIs receiving an “A status” rating from the GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation” in 2017 to better reflect the contributions of the global programme. Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2017 are the same for this indicator.
  • 53 2017 contexts: Haiti, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Somalia, Ukraine.
  • 54 2018 contexts: Central African Republic, Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Ukraine.
  • 55 2019 contexts: Central African Republic, Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 56 2020 contexts: Colombia, Guatemala, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Ukraine.
  • 57 In 2021, National Human Rights Institutions in Mozambique and Tanzania received support through the Tripartite Partnership among UNDP, UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions. Since the Global Programme’s Results Framework tracks aggregated results only across its 32 priority contexts, these two countries have not been listed under this indicator.
Weighing scale

Access to Justice

Expected Programme
Outputs		Output Indicators2BaselineResults
ValueYear2016
Actual		2017
Actual		2018
Actual		2019
Actual		2020
Actual		2021
Target		2021
Actual		Key Evidence
Output 5:
Access to justice for all is increased –particularly for vulnerable and marginalized groups, including minorities – and discrimination, exclusion and other drivers48		5.1 Number of
additional people
who have access to
justice		129,9332015209,444431,08627,999,
95659		29,527,
23960		31,787,
93561		35,559,
041		41,894,
930

2021 contexts:
Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Siera Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
(Cumulative result)
IRRF indicator 2.2.3.2.A62
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
5.3 Number of contexts with active access to justice and/or legal aid programmes
in place at the community level		12632015186423652566266724682727

2021 contexts:
Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
  • 58 GPRF Indicator 5.2 “Cases receiving judgment in the first instance of the formal justice system” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021).
  • 59 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 60 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, State of Palestine, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 61 2020 contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 62 IRRF indicator 2.2.3.2.A measures “Total number of additional population who have access to justice.” The previous IRRF indicator 3.4.1 (UNDP Strategic Plan 2013-2017) linked to GPRF indicator 5.1 measured “Total number of people who have access to legal aid services.”
  • 63 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Iraq, Jordan, Nepal, Pakistan, Somalia, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 64 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Nepal, Pakistan, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Kosovo [1].
  • 65 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 66 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 67 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 68 2020 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Burundi, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
Dove

Transitional Justice

Expected Programme
Outputs		Output Indicators2BaselineResults
ValueYear2016
Actual		2017
Actual		2018
Actual		2019
Actual		2020
Actual		2021
Target		2021
Actual		Key Evidence
Output 6:
Transitional justice processes and/ or mechanisms are promoted in conflict-affected contexts.57		6.2 Number of
contexts with
transitional justice
processes and/or
mechanisms in place		10702015127111721473157416751712

2021 contexts:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Mali, Sierra Leone, State of Palestine, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting
The IRRF indicator 3.2.2.1.B76


The annual target is: PARTIALLY ACHIEVED
  • 69 GPRF indicator 6.1 6.1 “Total number of victims whose grievances cases are addressed within transitional justice processes” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021).
  • 70 Baseline Contexts: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Libya, South Sudan, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 71 2016 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Liberia, Libya, South Sudan, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 72 2017 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Libya, South Sudan, Sudan, Sri Lanka, Tunisia
  • 73 2018 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Libya, Mali, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia
  • 74 2019 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Libya, Mali, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 75 2020 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Haiti, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 76 IRRF indicator 3.2.2.1.B measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: victim redress mechanisms including transitional justice”
Gender Icon

Gender Justice

Expected Programme
Outputs		Output Indicators2BaselineResults
ValueYear2016
Actual		2017
Actual		2018
Actual		2019
Actual		2020
Actual		2021
Target		2021
Actual		Key Evidence
Output 7:
Human rights, access to justice, and security for women and girls are increased.77		7.1 Number of
contexts with
programmes in place
to increase women’s
representation in the
justice and security
sectors		57820165797801181148219831319

2021 contexts:
Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau Haiti, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Somalia, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
7.2 Number of
contexts that have
a strengthened
legal and/or policy
framework in place to
prevent and address
sexual and gender-
based violence		38420157859861587198823891220

2021 contexts:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
IRRF indicator 1.6.2.2.A90
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
7.3 Number of
contexts with justice
and security services
and other
mechanisms/
processes in place to
prevent, respond to,
and address sexual
and gender-based
violence		11912015209219932394249523962123

2021 contexts:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine,Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting
IRRF indicator 1.6.2.2.B97


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
  • 77 GPRF indicator 7.4 “Existence of new and strengthened legal aid and justice services to prevent and address sexual and gender-based violence” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021).
  • 78 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
  • 79 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Nepal, Pakistan, Timor-Leste
  • 80 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Timor-Leste
  • 81 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Guinea-Bissau, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Tunisia
  • 82 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Kosovo [1].
  • 83 2020 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Lebanon, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1].
  • 84 Baseline Contexts: Sierra Leone, Sudan, Kosovo [1].
  • 85 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Mali, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Kosovo [1].
  • 86 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, South Sudan, Sudan, Kosovo [1].
  • 87 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Nepal, Somalia, Sudan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 88 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 89 2020 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 90 IRRF indicator 1.6.2.2.A measures “Number of additional contexts with frameworks in place to prevent and respond to SGBV: Multi-sectoral policy and legislation.”
  • 91 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan.
  • 92 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine.
  • 93 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Ukraine.
  • 94 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine.
  • 95 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 96 2020 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 97 IRRF indicator 1.6.2.2.B measures “Number of additional contexts with frameworks in place to prevent and respond to SGBV: multi-sectoral services including justice and security.”
Ribbon

Innovation

Expected Programme
Outputs		Output Indicators2BaselineResults
ValueYear2016
Actual		2017
Actual		2018
Actual		2019
Actual		2020
Actual		2021
Target		2021
Actual		Key Evidence
Output 8:
High quality programming is assured through improved quality assurances processes, mainstreamed human rights in programming, and strengthening of external partnerships.		8.1 Number
of projects/
programmes
undertaking
a uniform
M&E
approach		298201629941005101710281032538

2021 contexts:
Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic (2), Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo (2),
Guinea-Bissau (3), Iraq (3), Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic (2), Lebanon (2), Libya (2), Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan (2), Somalia (5), Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1].


Means of verification:
(Cumulative result)
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
8.2 Number
of projects/
programmes
utilizing
HRBA and
SES		191042016191052210628107371083341093536

2021 contexts:
Afghanistan (1), Bosnia and Herzegovina (2), Central African Republic (1), Colombia (4), Democratic Republic of the Congo (1), Guatemala (1), Guinea-Bissau (2), Haiti (2), Iraq (2), Jordan (1), Kyrgyzstan (1), Lebanon (2), Libya (1), Mali (1), Nepal (1), Somalia (2), Sri Lanka (2), State of Palestine (1), Sudan (1), Syria (1), Timor-Leste (2), Tunisia (1), Ukraine (1), Yemen (1), Kosovo (1) [1].


Means of verification:
UNDP Quality Assurance Assessments110


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
8.3 Number
of ongoing
and/or new
external
partnership
agreements
and
opportunities
supporting
the delivery
of UN rule
of law and
human rights
assistance		71112016711214113151141711520116652

2021 contexts:
Association for the Prevention of Torture; Civil Association for Equality and Justice (ACIJ); Conference of Ministers of Justice of Ibero-American Countries (COMJIB); Due Process of Law Foundation (DPLF); the Folke Bernadotte Academy; Geneva Center for Security Sector Governance (DCAF); the Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; The Global Focal Point for the Rule of Law (GFP); The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law (HiiL); Inter-American Association of Public Defenders (AIDEF); Ibero-American Association of Public Prosecutors (AIAMP); Inter-American Institute of Human Rights (IIHR); International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ); International Development Law Organisation (IDLO); International Foundation for Ibero-American Public Administration and Public Policy (FIIAPP); International IDEA; International Labour Organisaiton (ILO); International Security Sector Advisory Team (ISSAT); Inter-Agency Working Group on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, and the Inter-agency Security Sector Reform Task Force (IAWG - DDR & IASSRTF); Justice Studies Center of the Americas (JSCA); Latin American and the Caribbean Network for Democracy (REDLAD); Latin American and the Caribbean Women’s Security and Defense Network (AMASSURU); Namati: Innovations in Legal Empowerement; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation; NORDEM; Open Society Justice Initiative and the World Justice Project on measuring access to civil justice; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE); Oslo Governance Centre; Overseas Development Institute; Pathfinders; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; The Task Team on Law and Policy on Internal Displacement (TTLP) | Global Protection Cluster; UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPO); UN Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs (DPPA); UN Development Coordination Office (DCO); United Nations Environnemental Programme (UNEP); UNESCO; UN Global Compact; UNICEF; UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR); UN Team of Experts on the Rule of Law and Sexual Violence in Conflict (ToE) – DPO; UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict; UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC); United Nations University (UN University’s Centre for Policy Research); UNDP - OHCHR - Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI): Tri-Partite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP - UNHCR: Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP - UN Women: Gender Justice Partnership; UNDP - UNODA partnership SALIENT, Saving Lives Entity; USAID - UNDP InfoSegura Partnership; Working Group on Customary and Informal Justice; World Bank.


Means of verification:
RoLSHR reporting


The annual target is: ACHIEVED
  • 98 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
  • 99 2016 contexts: Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau.
  • 100 2017 contexts: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Jordan.
  • 101 2018 contexts: Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Jordan.
  • 102 2019 contexts: Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Jordan, State of Palestine.
  • 103 2020 contexts: Central African Republic (2), Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Jordan, State of Palestine.
  • 104 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
  • 105 2016 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan (2 projects), Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal (2 projects), Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 106 2017 contexts: SES: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan (2 projects), Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal (2 projects), Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1].
  • 107 UNDP only requires Quality Assurance assessments during the implementation phase of a project every other year. 2018 is an off year for the assessments; thus, the number of projects reported are lower. 2018 Contexts: Burundi, Bosnia and Herzegovina (2 projects), Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Haiti, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mali (2 projects), Myanmar, Lebanon, Liberia (2 projects), Somalia (3 projects), South Sudan, State of Palestine (2 projects), Sudan, Syria, Ukraine (2 projects), Yemen, Kosovo [1].
  • 108 2019 contexts: Afghanistan (3), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic (5), Colombia (2), Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic (2), Liberia (2), Libya, Mali (2), Myanmar, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Somalia (3), South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine (2), Kosovo [1] (2).
  • 109 2020 contexts: Central African Republic (1), Colombia (5), Guatemala (1), Guinea-Bissau (1), Haiti (2), Iraq (2), Jordan (1), Kyrgyz Republic (2), Liberia (2), Libya (1), Mali (2), Myanmar (1), Somalia (5), South Sudan (3), Sudan (2), Ukraine (1), Kosovo [1] (2).
  • 110 Information verified through the “UNDP Quality Assurance Assessments” is data gathered from corporate mechanisms to assure adherence to quality standards. Projects included in this indicator are ranked “satisfactory” or above when it comes to utilizing the SES standards, which includes HRBA as an overarching principle.
  • 111 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
  • 112 2016 Partnerships: The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP - OHCHR - GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions, The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; Clingendael, the Folke Bernadotte Academy, International Security Sector Advisory Team.
  • 113 2017 Active Partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies ; Clingendael; The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize;
    New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/ International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Open Society Justice Initiative Measuring Justice Initiative; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; UNDP - OHCHR - GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance
  • 114 2018 Partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies ; Clingendael; The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/ International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Open Society Justice Initiative Measuring Justice Initiative; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; University of Pennsylvania Law School/Chubb Rule of Law Fellowship, UNDP - OHCHR - GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP- UN Women – UNFPA Partnership on Gender Justice
  • 115 2019 partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; The Global Focal Point for Rule of Law; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International IDEA; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe; UNODC, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Open Society Justice Initiative and the World Justice Project on measuring access to civil justice; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; The UNDP – UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights – Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions Tri-Partite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP – UN Women – UNFPA Gender Justice Initiative; UN Women – UNDP Gender Justice Partnership and UNDP – UNODA partnership SALIENT – Saving Lives Entity.
  • 116 2020 partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; Geneva Center for Security Sector Governance (DCAF), The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; The Global Focal Point for Rule of Law; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International IDEA; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe; United Nations Team of Experts on the Rule of Law and Sexual Violence in Conflict – DPO, OHCHR, Office of the SRSG on Sexual Violence in Conflict and UNDP; UNODC, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Open Society Justice Initiative and the World Justice Project on measuring access to civil justice; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; United Nations University (UN University’s Centre for Policy Research); UNDP - UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights - Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions Tri-Partite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP - UN Women - UNFPA Gender Justice Initiative; UN Women - UNDP Gender Justice Partnership and UNDP - UNODA partnership SALIENT - Saving Lives Entity.